Lot of hearts in dogs throats
Hope you watched Wimbledon today. It was out of control. It was absolutely insane. And highlights will do it no justice. If you missed it, you missed out.
I'd call myself a neutral with a Federer crush, but it really didn't matter if you cared one way or the other today. Other sports can be exciting for the pageantry or the format, but tennis is just so much more exposed: there are no gimmicks. I think that leads to a lot of matches that maybe aren't worth watching, but it also leads to classics like today. Two guys who know each other's strengths and weaknesses so precisely that it takes 5 hours to separate them by a single point. So many important points that required perfect execution, nowhere to hide and no excuses. Somewhere Andy Murray and Andy Roddick were watching and wishing they were on the same planet.
Congratulations Rafa. Well deserved. And congratulations Federer for playing your part in a match so good that John McEnroe cried and tried to hug you in the post match interview (awkward!).
Other congrats and awards go to:
Nike -- most logos in a final with 25. 2+2+2+2 swooshes on shoes. 2+2+2+2 on socks. 1+1 on shorts. 1+1 on shirts. 1+1 on giant headbands. 1+2 on wristbands. Internal Nike marketing memo for Monday morning: encourage Federer to start wearing an additional wristband.
Boris Johnson -- worst hair. 8 millionth day running.
It wouldn't be a proper post without some criticism, so I'll apply that to the production. I started watching the match on BBC and ended it on NBC via Slingbox. The most obvious difference was that in the US we stuff a commercial between every game. The more annoying difference was the commentary. The Brits are subtle. They commentate on the match. They tell you the score and have interesting insights into the strategies of the players. The Americans are sensationalists, in search of the perfect soundbyte. Any commentary is secondary to banter intended to illicit an emotional response to the players and to the match of the day. If BBC calls it the greatest final ever played it carries a bit of gravitas. If an American network says the same thing it's because ... that's the match they're showing that day.
They don't bring out the best in each other, they bring out superman in each other.
I think we're gonna see a grown man cry.
Center court rising as one, as if this is one giant thank you.
Roger Federer: his grace never ends.
Rafael Nada: his humility never ceases.
No... no... there can't be a loser!! (yes, yes there can be. if you spoke these words with conviction, you are a loser.)
6 comments:
Great post, er/uk.
Jeff in California.
Thrilling match. Kinda wished Federer had eked out a win.
I'm curious as to who wrote that deleted comment...and why they felt it needed to be deleted.
Mor-on hyperbole:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/sports/playmagazine/20federer.html?pagewanted=all
And - didn't read this back in 2006 - but it's David Foster Wallace on Roger Federer. Must be terrific:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/sports/playmagazine/20federer.html?pagewanted=all
Almost forgot my favorite part of the day. At the pub watching the match (Act 2), fans were divided between:
Roger!
Go on Nadal!
Come on Arsenal!
Post a Comment